rbutr is primarily a browser plugin; we'd love you to register and join us.
That way, you'll be notified of rebuttals as you view the source page, you'll be able to add rebuttals to our system, and you'll be able to vote and subscribe to tags.

Facebook    Share on Google+ Google+ or
Welcome webmaster, your traffic came from the rbutr plugin, here is the link in our system for your page.
If you aren't a webmaster who found this URL in your logs, could you please let us know how you got it, you can use that feedback form to contact us too if you are the webmaster (we'd love to hear from you!). Thanks.

Source

 

Rebuttal information

Analysing the ‘900 papers supporting climate scepticism’: 9 out of top 10 authors linked to ExxonMobil
carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/04/900-papers-supporting-climate-scepticism-..
1 1

D
2 1 0.0019
Popular Technology.net: Are Skeptical Scientists funded by ExxonMobil?
populartechnology.net/2011/05/are-skeptical-scientists-funded-by.html
1 0

“Direct rebuttal, talks to the scientists mentioned in this article and asks them directly about their involvement.”
    Rebuttal link created 2012-02-16 11:37:54.604 by Craig

Tweets sharing the rebutted page...

Comments about this rebuttal

   
privacy policy  |  faq  |  screenshots  |  contact