rbutr is primarily a browser plugin; we'd love you to register and join us.
That way, you'll be notified of rbutls as you view the source page, you'll be able to add rbutls to our system, and you'll be able to vote and subscribe to tags.

rbutd

 

11 rbutls

Sixteen Concerned Scientists: No Need to Panic About Global Warming - WSJ.com
online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB100014240529702043014045771715318384213..
0 11

D
3 0 0.0026
Remarkable Editorial Bias on Climate Science at the Wall Street Journal - Forbes
forbes.com/sites/petergleick/2012/01/27/remarkable-editorial-bias-on-c..
A Forbes direct rebuttal of this article accusing editorial bias
2 0

Link by Shane
D
2 0 0.0016
The Latest Denialist Plea for Climate Change Inaction
skepticalscience.com/examining-the-latest-climate-denialist-plea-for-i..
Non Science doesn't refute science
1 0

Link by shaunb333
D
2 0 0.0014
While temperatures rise, denialists reach lower | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine
blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/01/30/while-temperatures-..
Destroys the claims and the 'scientist' element of the article
2 1

Link by Shane
D
2 0 0.0015
Why the Global Warming Skeptics Are Wrong by William D. Nordhaus | The New York Review of Books
nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/mar/22/why-global-warming-skeptics-..
Systematically addresses claims in the source article
1 1

Link by Shane
D
1 0 0.0001
Check With Climate Scientists for Views on Climate — Letters to the Editor - WSJ.com
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204740904577193270727472662.htm..
Addresses the lack of expertise of the 16 scientists and talks about the real scientific concensus
1 2

Link by Shane

1 0 0.0001
Climate change and the integrity of science
sciencemag.org/content/328/5979/689.full.pdf
An opposing view by an expert group of scientists
2 0

Link by Craig
D
1 0 0.0001
Panic Attack: Murdoch's Wall Street Journal Finds 16 Scientists to Push Pollutocrat Agenda With Long-Debunked Climate Lies | ThinkProgress
thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/01/29/413961/panic-attack-murdoch-wall-str..
Directly debunks the article, and lists other debunkings too.
1 0

Link by Shane
D
1 0 0.0001
Scientists Answer the Wall Street 16 « Climate Denial Crock of the Week
climatecrocks.com/2012/02/01/scientists-answer-the-wall-street-16/
direct rebuttal of WSJ letter
1 0

Link by GrahamC
D
1 0 0.0001
Dismal Science at the Wall Street Journal - The Equation
blog.ucsusa.org/dismal-science-at-the-wall-street-journal
A fairly editorial style rebuttal of this article accusing the authors and the WSJ of cherry picking their sources, and ignoring the big US ones like United States Global Change Research Program
2 0

Link by Shane
D
1 0 0.0001
The Latest Denialist Plea for Climate Change Inaction
skepticalscience.com/examining-the-latest-climate-denialist-plea-for-i..
Very detailed rebuttal of this article with information about each of the 16 scientists and their publications and associations.
2 0

Link by Shane
D
1 1 -0.0011
Global Cooling is Here
globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10783
If you're only looking at the average you might claim no warming. Fluctuations (hot and cold) and deviations are definitely on the increase.
1 0

Link by nava

Tweets sharing the rbutd page...

Loading twitter feed.
privacy policy  |  faq  |  screenshots  |  contact  |  how you can help