rbutr is primarily a browser plugin; we'd love you to register and join us.
That way, you'll be notified of rbutls as you view the source page, you'll be able to add rbutls to our system, and you'll be able to vote and subscribe to tags.

rbutd

 

5 rbutls

Popular Technology.net: 1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm
populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
0 5

D
6 2 0.0029
Energy and Environment – “journal of choice for climate skeptics”
carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/04/energy-and-environment-%E2%80%93-%E2%80%9..
Shows that the journal E&E, which is most used on this list, is of relative unimportance within climate science.
2 2

Link by SimonD
D
3 1 0.0010
Analysing the ‘900 papers supporting climate scepticism’: 9 out of top 10 authors linked to ExxonMobil
carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/04/900-papers-supporting-climate-scepticism-..
Shows the main authors from this list have a conflict of interest due to links with ExxonMobil.
1 1

Link by SimonD
D
3 1 0.0010
Poptech’s list of Confusion « itsnotnova
itsnotnova.wordpress.com/2011/06/30/poptechs-list-of-confusion/
Exposes numerous fallacies, shoddy and often contradictory selection criteria of poptech's list.
1 1

Link by SimonD
D
3 1 0.0010
Meet The Denominator
skepticalscience.com/meet-the-denominator.html
Shows that even if you make the massive assumption that all the papers on this list are valid, they still make up a paltry amount of the literature on AGW.
2 2

Link by SimonD
D
3 1 0.0010
900 Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming (AGW) Alarm
carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/04/900-papers-part-two-using-our-paper-is-mi..
Shows that many of the authors of papers on the list do not support claims that their papers are skeptical of AGW.
1 1

Link by SimonD

Tweets sharing the rbutd page...

Loading twitter feed.
privacy policy  |  faq  |  screenshots  |  contact  |  how you can help