“Dawkins is wrong. Matthew did not conceal his ideas at all. They were prominently published, prominently advertised, they were even cited by Darwin's friends. His book was not at all inapropriate or obscure. the subject mater was at the forefront of economic botany in the mid 19th century. All the brand new evidence supports the accusation that Darwin and Wallace plagiarized the discovery of natural selection form Patrick Matthew's prior publication. ”