rbutr is primarily a browser plugin; we'd love you to register and join us.
That way, you'll be notified of rbutls as you view the source page, you'll be able to add rbutls to our system, and you'll be able to vote and subscribe to tags.

Facebook    Share on Google+ Google+ or
Welcome webmaster, your traffic came from the rbutr plugin, here is the link in our system for your page.
If you aren't a webmaster who found this URL in your logs, could you please let us know how you got it, you can use that feedback form to contact us too if you are the webmaster (we'd love to hear from you!). Thanks.

rbutd

  

rbutl
Check With Climate Scientists for Views on Climate — Letters to the Editor - WSJ.com
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204740904577193270727472662.htm..
1 2

D
2 1 0.0001
Concerned Scientists Reply on Global Warming - WSJ.com
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203646004577213244084429540.htm..
2 0

“Argues that they provide a much needed second opinion, and that the scientific community is demonising climate change skeptics”
Skepticism Climate Change Science Politics
    Rebuttal link created 2012-02-24 11:36:42.032 by Shane

Tweets sharing the rbutd page...

Comments about this rbutl
Loading twitter feed.  
privacy policy  |  faq  |  screenshots  |  contact  |  how you can help