rbutr is primarily a browser plugin; we'd love you to register and join us.
That way, you'll be notified of rbutls as you view the source page, you'll be able to add rbutls to our system, and you'll be able to vote and subscribe to tags.

Facebook    Share on Google+ Google+ or
Welcome webmaster, your traffic came from the rbutr plugin, here is the link in our system for your page.
If you aren't a webmaster who found this URL in your logs, could you please let us know how you got it, you can use that feedback form to contact us too if you are the webmaster (we'd love to hear from you!). Thanks.

rbutd

 

rbutl

Feedback: What is the Most Compelling Scientific Evidence of a Young Earth? - Answers in Genesis
answersingenesis.org/articles/2006/02/27/feedback-evidence-young-earth
0 1


1 0 0.0001
Geologic Time: Radiometric Time Scale
pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/radiometric.html#table
2 0

“The discovery of the natural radioactive decay of uranium in 1896 by Henry Becquerel, the French physicist, opened new vistas in science. In 1905, the British physicist Lord Rutherford--after defining the structure of the atom-- made the first clear suggestion for using radioactivity as a tool for measuring geologic time directly; shortly thereafter, in 1907, Professor B. B. Boltwood, radiochemist of Yale University, published a list of geologic ages based on radioactivity.”
    Rebuttal link created 2014-02-26 13:26:54.334 by Chris Johnson

Tweets sharing the rbutd page...

Comments about this rbutl

Loading twitter feed.  
privacy policy  |  faq  |  screenshots  |  contact  |  how you can help