rbutr is primarily a browser plugin; we'd love you to register and join us.
That way, you'll be notified of rbutls as you view the source page, you'll be able to add rbutls to our system, and you'll be able to vote and subscribe to tags.

Facebook    Share on Google+ Google+ or
Welcome webmaster, your traffic came from the rbutr plugin, here is the link in our system for your page.
If you aren't a webmaster who found this URL in your logs, could you please let us know how you got it, you can use that feedback form to contact us too if you are the webmaster (we'd love to hear from you!). Thanks.

rbutd

 

rbutl

Asymmetry in The Lancet meta-analysis. - PubMed - NCBI
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16399256
0 1

D
2 0 0.0018
Prof Frass' criticism of the Lancet meta-analysis of homeopathy: a rebuttal of a rebuttal
edzardernst.com/2018/03/prof-frass-criticism-of-the-lancet-meta-analys..
1 0

“From the rebuttal: "Professor Frass has repeatedly stated that his published criticism of the Lancet meta-analysis has never been refuted, and therefore homeopathy is a valid therapy. The last time we heard him say this was during a TV discussion (March 2018) where he said that, if one succeeded in scientifically refuting the arguments set out in his paper, one would show the ineffectiveness of homeopathy." - Norbert Aust”
    Rebuttal link created 2018-03-22 21:51:31.884 by Unifex

Tweets sharing the rbutd page...

Comments about this rbutl

Loading twitter feed.  
privacy policy  |  faq  |  screenshots  |  contact  |  how you can help