“Lists numerous flaws in Jaworowski's claims.”

“Shows the main authors from this list have a conflict of interest due to links with ExxonMobil.”

“A more direct rebuttal, pointing out the dishonesty and bias inherent in the source page.”

“contradicts co2 causes warming”

“Shows authors responding to the paper saying their papers were categorised incorrectly”

“shows that long warming continues”

“Shows that many of the authors of papers on the list do not support claims that their papers are skeptical of AGW.”

“Climate change alarmism is a cult”

“Complete rebuttal of an alleged peer-reviewed debunking point by point”

“Complete rebuttal of Skeptical Science's Google Scholar Illiteracy not using quotes when searching for phrases, not being able to count past 1000 and not removing erroneous results.”

“Seriously, Heartland? “Some people”? I think you misspelled “everybody”, including the very China Academy of Sciences you were touting, because that’s precisely what you were saying.”

“Complete rebuttal to his lies, misinformation and strawman arguments. Including his failure to know that "Letters" is a term used to describe a type of peer-reviewed scientific document format in certain scholarly journals such as Nature.”

“A rebuttal to Steven Sherwood and the solar forcing pundits of the IPCC AR5 draft leak”

“”

“”

“Documents the censorship Skeptical Science results to when they lose an argument”

“Climate Change alarmism is a cult”

“Shows that even if you make the massive assumption that all the papers on this list are valid, they still make up a paltry amount of the literature on AGW.”

“”

“Dr. Tol uses statistics to show why Cook et al. is not a representative sample”

“Chart is only for the tropics”

“Climate Change alarmism is a cult”

“Dr. Tol uses statistics to show why Cook et al. is not a representative sample”

“Shows that the Popular Technology blog resorts to cherry picking, fake experts and misrepresentations in an abysmal attempt to cast doubt on the established consensus.”

“Lomborg’s analysis suffers from several problems, including selective use of data, oversimplification of issues, posing the wrong questions, and lack of objectivity in his quest for optimistic trends.”

“Lomborg’s analysis suffers from several problems, including selective use of data, oversimplification of issues, posing the wrong questions, and lack of objectivity in his quest for optimistic trends.”

“Direct rebuttal, talks to the scientists mentioned in this article and asks them directly about their involvement.”

“Complete rebuttal of the Carbon Brief's lies, misinformation and strawman arguments”

“Shows authors responding to the paper saying their papers were categorised incorrectly”

“”

“Shows that the journal E&E, which is most used on this list, is of relative unimportance within climate science.”