Rebuttals added: 4
Rebuttal votes: x
Rebuttal clicks: 4
Points: 9
Rank: x of x
Being Human: Psychological and Philosophical Perspectives - Richard Gross - Google Books books.google.co.uk/books/about/Being_Human_Psychological_and_Philosoph.. |
1 0 0.0001 |
BestThinking / Thinkers / Science / Social Sciences / Sociology / Mike Sutton (Blog) - Richard Dawkins, Charles Darwin and Selfish Replicator DNA Exposed! bestthinking.com/thinkers/permalink/3954?tab=blog&title=mike-sutton&bl..
“Richard dawkins did not coin the term 'replicator' not the basic biological concept. But he did replicate the term and give the impression the concept was his”
Link by Mike Sutton 01 Mar
|
Monkeys on Our Backs - Richard Tokumei - Google Books books.google.co.uk/books/about/Monkeys_on_Our_Backs.html?id=9HZsWA8-9P.. |
1 0 0.0001 |
BestThinking / Thinkers / Science / Social Sciences / Sociology / Mike Sutton (Blog) - The Selfish Gene Myth is Bust: Richard Dawkins is an Invented Originator bestthinking.com/thinkers/permalink/3954?tab=blog&title=mike-sutton&bl..
“Richard Dawkins did not originate either the term or the basic biological concept of the 'selfish gene' Bill Hamilton did”
Link by Mike Sutton 01 Mar
|
No title : amazon.com/In-Darwins-Shadow-Biographical-Psychology/dp/0199856532 amazon.com/In-Darwins-Shadow-Biographical-Psychology/dp/0199856532 |
1 0 0.0001 |
BestThinking / Thinkers / Science / Social Sciences / Sociology / Mike Sutton (Blog) - Crooks not Schnooks: Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace Committed the World’s Greatest Science Fraud bestthinking.com/thinkers/permalink/3954?tab=blog&title=mike-sutton&bl..
“”
Link by Mike Sutton 01 Mar
|
Seeing Further: The Story of Science and the Royal Society: Amazon.co.uk: Bill Bryson: Books amazon.co.uk/Seeing-Further-Story-Science-Society/dp/0007302576 |
2 0 0.0008 |
BestThinking / Thinkers / Science / Social Sciences / Sociology / Mike Sutton (Blog) - Crooks not Schnooks: Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace Committed the World’s Greatest Science Fraud bestthinking.com/thinkers/permalink/3954?tab=blog&title=mike-sutton&bl..
“Dawkins is wrong. Matthew did not conceal his ideas at all. They were prominently published, prominently advertised, they were even cited by Darwin's friends. His book was not at all inapropriate or obscure. the subject mater was at the forefront of economic botany in the mid 19th century. All the brand new evidence supports the accusation that Darwin and Wallace plagiarized the discovery of natural selection form Patrick Matthew's prior publication. ”
Link by Mike Sutton 01 Mar
|